[Frederica-l] Dallas Morning News: Open Season on Beauty
Frederica at aol.com
Frederica at aol.com
Sun Oct 1 19:11:40 EDT 2006
This opinion piece appeared this morning in the Dallas Morning News. It
started when I wrote an email to a few friends after seeing this movie with Hannah
-- I felt dejected and kind of hopeless about all the ugliness that surrounds
us. One of my friends, Rod Dreher, edits the "Points" opinion section of the
DMN, and asked me to turn it into a publishable piece -- not a movie review,
but an essay on this problem. So I polished it up and added a bit of humor and
some biting comments and sent it back. Rod said no, what he wanted was the tone
of sadness in my original email. He said that a lot of people probably feel
the same way. So I rewrote it with that in mind. I think it was a good call --
I've gotten a couple of emails from readers already.
here's the URL:
http://www.frederica.com/writings/open-season-on-beauty.html
******
"I didn't like the part in the restaurant," Hannah, my 6-year-old
granddaughter, said. We were leaving a screening of Sony's new animated feature, "Open
Season," and I was trying to remember any scene in a restaurant. When she said
it was "too messy," I realized that she meant an early scene where the movie's
lead characters, a suburban bear and a one-antlered deer, run loose in a
mini-mart. After they rip open candy bars, gulp down slushies (bypassing the use of
cups), and get a tongue tangled in the hot dog roller, the place is a sticky
disaster.
I said, "I didn't like the next part, when you see the bear through the
window, and then he throws up on the window." The memory of that fountain of
candy-flecked green rose to mind. "Oh," she said. "I didn't know that was supposed
to be throw-up."
Grandparents have had all kinds of post-movie conversations with kids over
the last seventy years or so, but this is probably the first time it's included
a lesson on identifying vomit.
After I took Hannah home, I just felt sad. This is a movie about talking
animals, so it can't be aimed at kids much older than she is. But there wasn't any
element I could honestly say was enjoyable -- nothing that sparked wonder.
There was lots of skittering and slamming and noise, and the screen often filled
up with images that were just plain ugly.
For example, early on the deer wants the bear to promise to be his friend. So
he hocks up something slimy and spits it into his hand, then holds it out,
dripping, for a shake.
Not much later the deer and bear are lost in the forest, and the bear needs a
toilet. He asks the deer, "Well, what do you do?" The deer says, "I don't
know," and releases a stream of turds.
The deer (who walks on his hind legs) offers to carry the bear's teddybear
backpack. He straps it in front, over his crotch, where it waggles as he walks
along.
Sure, potty-talk has always been funny to kids. But grownups didn't teach it
to them. They had something more significant to impart: stories to help
children prepare for the world they were growing into. The best stories were complex
and unafraid to deal with tragedy, like Hans Christian Anderson's "The Little
Mermaid," or Carlo Collodi's "Pinocchio."
Earlier generations of parents complained that cartoon versions of such
classic tales stripped them of all subtlety. The process has gone a step further in
a movie like "Open Season," where the plot presents only a starkly polarized
pair of teams, good guys versus bad guys, and then whips up a frenzy of
vengeance.
There's an innate human craving to identify an "other" whom you can hate with
a full, free, undivided hatred. But till recently children's entertainment
did not feed that urge. In fact older stories, like "Kidnapped" or "The Count of
Monte Cristo," used examples of unjust treatment to show a hero responding
with mercy and renouncing revenge. Does it really prepare our children for a
global culture when today's stories instead celebrate self-righteous glee and
violent revenge?
I talked this over later with Hannah's mom, and she brought up one of her own
pet peeves: Bratz dolls. These are plastic gals who have huge
cartoon-goldfish lips. They wear torso-hugging, midriff-baring clothes, enormous platform
shoes, and a sly expression. They're for girls 4 to 7 years old. When Hannah
first saw them she said, "Why would anybody want a doll that's ugly?"
Megan said, "There's something creepy about the popularity of these dolls.
Shouldn't little girls want things that are beautiful? Why do they reject beauty
and wholesomeness at such a young age?"
I inherited a picture book that had belonged to a great-great-great aunt, and
inside the covers she'd drawn pictures of beautiful women. I guess girls have
always done that, but in her case it was 1870, and the women are wearing
ballgowns adorned with tiers of lace, with petticoats and pantaloons underneath.
In the 1960's, I drew women wearing a sheath dress and a mink stole, with hair
in a Grace Kelly chignon. Do little girls now draw smirking women with exposed
navels and heavy eye makeup? Has "edgy" become the new "beautiful"?
The usual retort is, "So just don't watch these movies" or "Just don't buy
those dolls." But you don't have to buy this stuff; it leaks under the door.
American entertainment culture has reached into every corner of the world, and if
it's not in your home, it's in the home of the kid who sits next to yours in
school. If you still don't think snot is particularly funny, and don't think
it's a good idea to luxuriate in revenge fantasies, you're in the minority.
This ugly, mean-spirited stuff is mingled with the very air we breathe.
So when I'm leaving the mall with Hannah I'm behind two middle-aged women who
are laughing and loudly using the F-word. We pass a guy coming in wearing a
t-shirt with an obscene message. Outside, there are obese teenage girls with
too much pasty flesh spilling out of too-small clothes, trying to look haughty.
Hannah is a quiet, modest, self-possessed little girl, and unlikely to ever
find such things appealing. But I can't help feeling sorrow that she's growing
up in such an ugly age.
********
Frederica Mathewes-Green
www.frederica.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ctcnet.net/pipermail/frederica-l/attachments/20061001/e68637da/attachment.htm
More information about the Frederica-l
mailing list